Published March 12th, 2008
The Future of Open Source in BI
At last Thursday’s TDWI Benelux Chapter meeting, Davy Nys of Pentaho gave an overview of how open source could/might/will change the face of Business Intelligence. He gave a reasonably good vendor-neutral presentation (important for TDWI events). His session was a nice compliment to the “BI Trends” presentation given by Steve Hoberman an hour earlier.
Perhaps there is a trend for organizations to turn to more open-source software solutions for BI projects. After all, Davy’s company and others like Talend and CloverETL are making great strides in competing for market share.
As the big players in BI continue to merge and consolidate, it is pretty exciting to see several open source vendors and tools emerge. Is this a reflection of the community’s general dissatisfaction regarding commercial software? Are the open source solutions better? Is this truly a trend to be reckoned with? Should MS and others be worried?
Open Source Considerations
Davy stressed the importance of reducing the TCO of BI software. Without licensing fees, open-source can do just that. As Rick Sherman predicts in an article for DM Review, TCO will become a much more significant factor in the adoption of any and all BI trends. Licensing costs could impact TCO in such a dramatic way that a company can save a significant amount on their investment by switching to open source.
TCO isn’t the only consideration. Before evaluating open-source software, Davy suggests to examine the vibrancy of the community. A vibrant community with contributors and enthusiasts is a good sign for future product development and support.
Licensing is yet another very important consideration. As part of his presentation, Davy initiated a discussion on viral verses non-viral licensing. here’s is how I understand it: In a “viral” agreement, any source code changes to the product must be returned back to the public. Non-viral agreements allow companies to modify the source as they see fit without having to report back to the community. With viral licensing, I would have tremendous concerns about intellectual property and protecting business practices and methods.
What I found strange about the Q&A session and roundtable discussion that followed his presentation was the focus on the Pentaho business model. The concern of some BI professionals is thus: How can the economics associated with running an open source software company be sustainable over a long period of time? The question is relevant because as BI Professionals, we need to supply solutions that will be supportable, scalable, and usable in the future. The concern is that a company — like Pentaho — might not live and thrive long enough to meet the long-term needs of the business. I am not qualified to answer this question, but I admit, I wonder myself. Davy did an excellent job of presenting the case, however. If you need details on how Pentaho and other open source organizations make their money, it would be best to contact them directly. These are valid concerns and should be part of tool analysis that should go on early in a project’s planning.
…
I am open to the possibilities that open source can provide for BI applications. I use open source software all the time (from Wordpress to MySQl to Codeplex), but for a mission critical business initiative? Before making a decision like that, I would certainly need to have more information and a project to try it out on.
To learn more about Davy, you can check out his LinkedIn profile or visit the Pentaho website.
Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence consultant, with expertise in business analysis, data modeling, and data integration. Extensive experience developing vertical and integrated desktop and Internet applications spanning municipal, clinical, and financial industries.