<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Formula 409: Private Companies Must Comply with SOX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/</link>
	<description>Supporting decisions through sound data management</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Innovation Interrupted? « Tod means Fox</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-13622</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Interrupted? « Tod means Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/#comment-13622</guid>
		<description>[...] led to Sarbanes-Oxley, an innovation choker that had (and has) the potential to punish organizations for taking R&amp;D risks. But Enron and other failures of its time exposed some serious flaws in how US companies are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] led to Sarbanes-Oxley, an innovation choker that had (and has) the potential to punish organizations for taking R&amp;D risks. But Enron and other failures of its time exposed some serious flaws in how US companies are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOX to Go the Way of Gitmo Bay? &#171; Tod means Fox</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-13480</link>
		<dc:creator>SOX to Go the Way of Gitmo Bay? &#171; Tod means Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/#comment-13480</guid>
		<description>[...] Media, &#8220;Auditing Your Warehouse For Sox Compliance&#8221; as well as in my post &#8220;Formula 409: Private Companies Must Comply with SOX&#8220;. In my blog post, I said that innovation would take a series hit due to Section 409&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media, &#8220;Auditing Your Warehouse For Sox Compliance&#8221; as well as in my post &#8220;Formula 409: Private Companies Must Comply with SOX&#8220;. In my blog post, I said that innovation would take a series hit due to Section 409&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2008/04/04/formula-409-private-companies-must-comply-with-sox/#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;internal audit checklist...&lt;/strong&gt;

Maybe, but I'm not sure it'for everyone....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>internal audit checklist&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Maybe, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;for everyone&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
