<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Certification revamp at MS does not inlude VFP</title>
	<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/</link>
	<description>Business Intelligence, Data Warehousing, SQL, Visual FoxPro.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: link</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-222</link>
		<author>link</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;hi...&lt;/strong&gt;

Agree...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hi&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Agree&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod means Fox &#124; Hand Coding the Data Warehouse with VFP</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-104</link>
		<author>Tod means Fox &#124; Hand Coding the Data Warehouse with VFP</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] Download it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Download it here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod McKenna</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-46</link>
		<author>Tod McKenna</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Wow -- that long! Thanks for the insight, Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8212; that long! Thanks for the insight, Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamSanders</title>
		<link>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-45</link>
		<author>WilliamSanders</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.todmeansfox.com/2007/06/19/certification-revamp-at-ms-does-not-inlude-vfp/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Alas, the MS VFP Certs have been gone for a while now- Last stopped with VFP v6 in the MCSD tracks.  Used to be - you could take 4 exams, get yer MCSD cert, and take an additional 4 exams (was that right?) to get yer MCDBA cert, where VFP COUNTED as one of the electives in the MCDBA. 

I don't remember the exact year when it stopped, but I'll guess 2003-forward, it simply wasn't available.  I wrote about it on another VFP-centric website ages past, not even sure if it's searchable there any more.  

Warmest Regards [Bill]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, the MS VFP Certs have been gone for a while now- Last stopped with VFP v6 in the MCSD tracks.  Used to be - you could take 4 exams, get yer MCSD cert, and take an additional 4 exams (was that right?) to get yer MCDBA cert, where VFP COUNTED as one of the electives in the MCDBA. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember the exact year when it stopped, but I&#8217;ll guess 2003-forward, it simply wasn&#8217;t available.  I wrote about it on another VFP-centric website ages past, not even sure if it&#8217;s searchable there any more.  </p>
<p>Warmest Regards [Bill]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
